Warde

Access requests people love.
Evidence auditors trust.

Warde puts access requests, approvals and reviews in your ServiceNow portal, looking like the rest of it. Behind every screen, all access is approved by a named person and every removal is confirmed, so you know who can reach what and can prove it.

Works with SailPoint, Saviynt, Okta and Microsoft Entra, with no ID Governance add-on needed, or with ServiceNow tasks where you have no engine.

My Access in the ServiceNow portal for Fiona Ledger: shortcuts to request or remove access and bundles, and the access she holds
238public companies disclosed a material weakness in fiscal 2025, KPMG found. In IT, most were about access.
1 dayfrom install to live, with Guided Setup
US$250k+a year of time back for a 10,000-person company
3 monthsor less to pay back the subscription from those savings

It looks and feels like the rest of your portal.

Every screen lives in your ServiceNow portal, where your staff already order laptops and book leave. Plain names, one place to ask, nothing new to log in to and nothing to learn.

Ask for access like ordering anything else

Search by name and put several applications in one request. The form only offers what you can be given, marks what you already hold, and names your approver before you submit.

Portal · Request access
The request form: a search for Oracle access, with high-risk and already-active items marked

A new starter's access in one request

Pick the bundle for the job, add as many starters as you need, and accept the terms once. Anything someone sets up by hand is flagged, so nobody is surprised by the wait.

Portal · Access bundles
A Financial Analyst starter bundle on a request, with its items, approver, terms of use and conflict check

A review a line manager can finish

Keep or take away, one row at a time or several at once, with each row saying how the person got that access. Away or unsure? Delegate the review, or pass it to a colleague who knows the team.

Portal · Manager review
A manager review of standing access, six of ten decided, with Keep and Remove on each row

Your IAM team runs it, with no developer

Guided Setup takes you from install to live, and each step checks the instance as you go. Wizards then bring each new application on board and change who approves what, with no update sets.

Warde setup · Guided Setup
Guided Setup: its steps down the side with what each found on the instance, and the approval policies step open with five policies ready

Start from wherever you are.

Most customers arrive in one of three places. Warde fits each one without asking you to change the identity system you have.

Typically 1,000 to 10,000 staff

Entra, and no governance product

Microsoft 365 and Entra, with reviews in a spreadsheet. Warde changes Entra groups, app roles and licences itself, so you get requests, approvals and reviews without buying Entra ID Governance or a suite. Groups synced from Active Directory change through a MID Server, and everything outside Entra goes as a ServiceNow task. Entra · Access requests

Typically 3,000 to 15,000 staff

Saviynt or Entra ID Governance

ServiceNow reaches your engine through a vendor plugin or a connector built years ago. Warde puts asking and reviewing in your ServiceNow portal and hands the change over on a supported connector. Entra · Saviynt

Typically 15,000 staff and up

SailPoint

IdentityIQ or Identity Security Cloud, joined to ServiceNow by something built years ago. Warde replaces it with a supported connector and adds reviews decided in ServiceNow. SailPoint

Evidence an auditor can test.

The most common IT weakness a public company discloses is somebody's access. Warde answers the three questions an auditor asks about it, from records nobody can edit or delete.

Was it approved first?

Every piece of access names who approved it, when, and the rule that sent it to them. Conflicting access is caught on the form, before anyone approves.

Was it really removed?

A removal is done only when the system that made it confirms it. Leavers and review revocations go down the same path.

Was the review complete?

A campaign freezes its scope and reviewers the moment it starts, so you can show exactly what was in front of each reviewer.

SOX 404Authorised provisioning, timely removal, periodic review and separation of duties
PCI DSS 4.0Requirement 7.2.4: accounts and access reviewed at least every six months
ISO 27001Annex A 5.18: access rights reviewed at planned intervals and recorded
APRA CPS 234Access controls over information assets, tested and evidenced
DORA and NIS2Access rights reviewed as part of ICT risk management

Role-based access, without the 18‑month role project.

Your teams build a bundle for each job in your ServiceNow portal. The owners sign it off once, and from then on a new starter needs one request and one approval. A study for NIST published in 2010 found a role programme took about 18 months and cost a 10,000-person company US$2.4 million, in 2009 dollars.

An accounts payable starter, without a bundle

6 requests · 11 approvals

  • SAP Accounts Payable
  • Invoice inbox
  • Finance SharePoint
  • Accounts payable mailbox
  • Finance reports
  • GlobalProtect VPN

The same starter, with the bundle

1 request · 1 approval

  • Every item pre-approved by its owner
  • The manager approves once
  • High-risk items still ask their own approvers
  • Reviewed later as one decision
  • Hand it out from your HR feed when you are ready

An agent inherits the access of whoever ran it.

Copilots and MCP clients act with the user's own permissions. Every piece of access someone should have lost three roles ago is now reachable by software acting in their name. Keeping human access correct is what Warde does, and it is what an agent borrows.

Works with the identity system you own, or with none.

Every connector is included, and on Microsoft Entra you need no ID Governance licence. Where there is no engine, the work goes as a ServiceNow task to the team that owns the application.

What each vendor’s ServiceNow application does on your instance.

A tick means the work happens in ServiceNow. A dash usually means the vendor does it well in its own console.

In ServiceNowWardeSailPointSaviyntEntra
Ask for access in the ServiceNow catalogyesyesyesyes
Approve it in ServiceNowyesyesyesyes
Checked before it is sent: separation of duties, terms of use and the owner’s notesyes: terms of use and the owner’s notes wherever they are set, and the separation-of-duties verdict where SailPoint checks itpartly: separation of duties is checked on the form, set to warn or block; terms of use and owner’s notes are not documentedpartly: the requester sees possible separation-of-duties conflicts; terms of use and owner’s notes are not documentednot documented in ServiceNow: Entra checks incompatible access packages in its own My Access portal
Your identity engine does the provisioningyesyesyesyes
Time-bound access: an end date on the request, within a limit you set, with a warning before it endsyespartly: a sunset date on the form, which can be made mandatory; Identity Security Cloud removes the access and emails its own reminderspartly: start and end dates on the request; who removes the access, and any warning, are not documentedpartly: a duration on the request where the access package allows one; Entra removes the access, and its reminder email is off by default
Removing access in ServiceNow, by the holder or their manager, confirmed backyespartly: a manager can remove a direct report’s access, but people cannot remove their own over the usual connectionpartly: a Remove access item, with the request updated once Saviynt completes it; who may remove for whom is not documentedpartly: people can remove their own access packages; removal by a manager is not documented
User access reviews decided in ServiceNowyesyes, for Identity Security Cloud: SailPoint documents a certification portal in ServiceNow where certifiers approve, revoke and sign offnono
Campaigns defined and scheduled in ServiceNowyestheir consoletheir consoletheir console
Approval policies built in ServiceNowyesnonono
Access bundles curated in ServiceNowyesnonono
My Access: one page for what you and your team hold, and the reviews waiting on youyespartly: the app shows the roles and access profiles a person holds, without a team view or reviews on the same pagenot statedtheir console
An admin workspace on the instance: what is stuck, what is stale, connector healthyesnot statednot statedno
The auditor’s evidence pack, in ServiceNowyesnonono
Runs with no identity engine at allyesnonono
Spots the joiner and the leaver for younot on its own: your own joiner and leaver trigger calls Warde’s lifecycle endpoint, and Warde provisions from thereyesyesyes
How we read the vendors

Read from each vendor’s published documentation and ServiceNow Store listing in September and October 2026. On the rows for checks, end dates and removals, “partly” means the vendor documents part of it, such as a separation-of-duties check on the form with no terms of use. For SailPoint on the My Access row, “partly” means the app shows what a person holds, without the team view or the reviews waiting. SailPoint’s tick on user access reviews is for Identity Security Cloud’s Service Catalog app, which needs its own SailPoint licence: reviewers decide their campaign items and sign off in ServiceNow, while the campaign is built and scheduled in Identity Security Cloud. The IdentityIQ integration does not include it. On the last row, Warde does not watch your HR feed. Whichever system already knows somebody has joined or left calls Warde’s lifecycle endpoint, and Warde grants or removes the access from there. The full sixty-three-row version, sources attached, is yours if you ask for it.

Nothing to host. No Warde cloud.

One scoped app in your own instance. There is no vendor cloud and no middleware, so the record of who holds what stays on your instance. How Warde handles your data.

Runs on your instance
Installed from the Store as one versioned release. Your platform team already knows how to run it.
Survives an engine change
Approval policies, owners and the audit history live in ServiceNow, so moving to a new identity system doesn’t start you from zero.
Outbound only
Calls your identity system on credentials held in your instance. Nothing calls in.
AI ready, with no AI licence needed
It works the same without Now Assist. If you have Now Assist for Virtual Agent, Warde ships Request Access (Simple), a conversational version of the request form that asks for one item for one person a turn at a time; switch it on once Now Assist and AI Search are set up. ServiceNow’s MCP support can also put Warde’s REST API in front of your assistants, working as the person signed in.

The business case

US$250k+

a year of time back for a 10,000-person company, once most joiners and movers have a bundle. The subscription pays for itself in under three months.

Where it comes fromHoursValue
Service desk time on access requests2,625US$118,000
Asking, approving, and new starters waiting2,230US$100,000
Bundles: 4,100 fewer approvals1,110US$50,000
High-risk reviews run as campaigns310US$14,000
A year6,275US$282,000
How each line is worked out

All at US$45 an hour. Service desk: 8,750 access requests a year at 40 minutes, 45 percent taken out by connectors and named tasks. Business time: requesters, approvers, managers deciding what a joiner needs, and half a day a new starter loses to missing access. Bundles: four in five joiners and movers on bundles, less the time to build and keep 100 of them. Reviews: 38 applications a quarter, three hours each by hand, 45 minutes as a campaign.

Every business-side figure is an assumption set low on purpose. Swap in your own before taking it to a budget holder. Sources: Fixify 2026 IT Help Desk Benchmark, ESG (now Omdia), RTI International for NIST, Ponemon for GuidePoint, HDI, Gartner.

Built and running, waiting on Store certification.

Working today

  • Access requests, removals and approval policies
  • Copy from a person: start a request from what a colleague holds
  • Access bundles, requested or handed out from your HR feed
  • User access reviews and the evidence pack
  • Guided Setup, from install to live, checking the instance at each step
  • My Access: one portal page for everything a person and their team hold, and the reviews waiting on them
  • SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, IdentityIQ, Microsoft Entra and Saviynt connectors, and Okta read with changes sent as tasks
  • Joiners, movers and leavers through one API
  • End dates, with warnings before access is removed
  • Groups synced from Active Directory, changed through a MID Server
  • AI assistants such as Claude look up, request, remove and review access through the Warde API, with guided steps to connect them over MCP

Coming soon

  • Active Directory groups that are not synced to Entra, through a MID Server
  • Separation of duties rules kept in Warde for Entra and Active Directory, with signed exceptions
  • SailPoint and Saviynt roles carried over to Entra as Warde bundles
  • Review lines that show last use, unusual access and conflicts, with a suggested decision
  • A review of what a person asked for in their old job, before they move
  • Extra accounts, such as an admin account, and Entra guests from partner organisations
  • End dates on a whole bundle
  • Privileged access for a set time window
  • Licence limits from SAM Pro on requests and approvals

Need something on neither list? Tell us. Releases are short and the people who ask set the order.

Warde

Middle English, said ward

In medieval England, warde was the keeping of something on another’s behalf: the watch on a city gate, or the custody of an heir and his lands until he came of age. Whoever held the warde answered for who went in. That is the whole idea: keep watch over who can reach what, and answer for every key handed out.

Bring the access request you hate most.

Forty-five minutes on a live instance, with no slides. We'll show you what replaces it, what it costs, and what the product still can't do.

Warde is priced per user. Book a walkthrough or get in touch for a quote.